Change in motivational bias during treatment predicts outcome in anorexia nervosa.

OBJECTIVE: Reward and punishment sensitivity are known to be altered in anorexia nervosa (AN). Most research has examined these constructs separately although motivated behavior is influenced by considering both the potential for reward and risk of punishment. The present study sought to compare the relative balance of reward and punishment sensitivity in AN versus healthy controls (HCs) and examine whether motivational bias is associated with AN symptoms and treatment outcomes. METHODS: Adolescents and adults with AN (n = 262) in a partial hospitalization program completed the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System (BIS/BAS) scales, and Sensitivity to Punishment/Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) at admission and discharge. HCs (HC; n = 90) completed the BIS/BAS and SPSRQ. Motivational Bias Scores were calculated to reflect the dominance of reward versus punishment sensitivity. RESULTS: Individuals with AN demonstrated significantly greater bias toward punishment sensitivity than HC. In AN, a bias toward punishment was associated with higher EDE-Q Global score at admission. Change in motivational bias during treatment predicted EDE-Q Global scores, but not BMI, at discharge, with greater increases in reward sensitivity or greater decreases in punishment sensitivity during treatment predicting lower eating pathology. Similar findings were observed using the BIS/BAS and SPSRQ. DISCUSSION: Change in motivational bias during treatment is associated with improved outcomes in AN. However, it appears that much of the change in motivational bias can be attributed to changes in punishment sensitivity, rather than reward sensitivity. Future research should examine the mechanisms underlying punishment sensitivity decreases during treatment. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Sensitivity to reward and punishment may be important treatment targets for individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN). To date, most research has considered reward and punishment sensitivity separately, rather than examining their relationship to each other. We found that the balance of reward and punishment sensitivity (i.e., motivational bias) differs between healthy controls and those with AN and that this bias is associated with eating disorder symptoms and treatment outcome.

Greater reliance on model-free learning in adolescent anorexia nervosa: An examination of dual-system reinforcement learning.

Alterations in learning and decision-making systems are thought to contribute to core features of anorexia nervosa (AN), a psychiatric disorder characterized by persistent dietary restriction and weight loss. Instrumental learning theory identifies a dual-system of habit and goal-directed decision-making, linked to model-free and model-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Difficulty arbitrating between these systems, resulting in an over-reliance on one strategy over the other, has been implicated in compulsivity and extreme goal pursuit, both of which are observed in AN. Characterizing alterations in model-free and model-based systems, and their neural correlates, in AN may clarify mechanisms contributing to symptom heterogeneity (e.g., binge/purge symptoms). This study tested whether adolescents with restricting AN (AN-R; n = 36) and binge/purge AN (AN-BP; n = 20) differentially utilized model-based and model-free learning systems compared to a healthy control group (HC; n = 28) during a Markov two-step decision-making task under conditions of reward and punishment. Associations between model-free and model-based learning and resting-state functional connectivity between neural regions of interest, including orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), nucleus accumbens (NAcc), putamen, and sensory motor cortex (SMC) were examined. AN-R showed higher utilization of model-free learning compared to HC for reward, but attenuated model-free and model-based learning for punishment. In AN-R only, higher model-based learning was associated with stronger OFC-to-left NAcc functional connectivity, regions linked to goal-directed behavior. Greater utilization of model-free learning for reward in AN-R may differentiate this group, particularly during adolescence, and facilitate dietary restriction by prioritizing habitual control in rewarding contexts.

The moderating effect of anxiety diagnosis on the relationship between error-related negativity and anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns.

Anxiety sensitivity (AS) refers to fear of anxiety symptoms that are believed to result in physical (Physical Concerns), cognitive (Cognitive Concerns), or social (Social Concerns) harm. AS is implicated in a range of anxiety disorders and may propel maladaptive behaviors by increasing action monitoring systems in order to prevent errors. Indeed, anxious individuals are characterized by elevated neural responses to errors, as indexed by the error-related negativity (ERN). In the current study we examined the moderating effect of clinical diagnosis on the relationship between scores on the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI-3) and the ERN in an unselected sample (N = 124) of women. Based on semi-structured clinical interviews, participants were classified as belonging to an anxiety group (AD), a clinical control group (CC), and a healthy non-clinical group (HC). Participants completed an arrowhead version of the Flanker task while we collected electroencephalogram (EEG) data. Analyses revealed that diagnostic group moderated the association between residualized ERN (ERNResid) and Cognitive Concerns, such that the AD group demonstrated a significantly stronger and more negative association compared to the HC group. Our results indicate that the relationship between ERNResid and Cognitive Concerns is strongest in individuals characterized by elevated anxiety.

Anhedonia in Eating Disorders.

Anhedonia is frequently observed among individuals with eating disorders (ED), though its relevance to ED pathology and clinical outcomes remain poorly understood. This chapter will present the latest findings regarding anhedonia in ED, with the majority of data available for anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). We consider anhedonia from the mechanistic lens of altered reward processing, with attention given to subjective experience, neurotransmitter function, neural correlates, and cognitive performance corresponding to distinct components of reward (i.e., liking, wanting, and learning). Findings from animal models are also highlighted. The chapter concludes with a discussion of implications for treatment and future directions aimed at better understanding anhedonia in ED.